Saturday, 14 April 2007
There can never be a
good without a
bad. Neither can there be a
bad without a
good. This is because
good &
bad are both comparative terms and one is meaningless without the other. Thus,
good &
bad must be able to occur simultaneously and must co-exist within the identical timeframe. Therefore,
good &
bad rival each other in importantance and neither outweighs the other.
Following the logic,
good &
bad are then tentative and not completely objective. How good is something is dependent on how bad is the opposite sitiuation, and vice versa. Therefore, with the subjectivity of
good &
bad in mind, we are able to conclude that rules, morals, the law, etc are not the absoloute truth. In fact, they are just a temporary justification of a particular issue, which simply fulfils the need for orderliness. These changes with time and the situation that we are in. Thus, breaking such an aspect is not totally wrong, but instead signifies the need to consider a change.
In conclusion, any aspect of what is
good &
bad canot be fully trusted.
Environmentalist Blogged:14:26
Hiya poeple!
During Helmsman week for agape, Mr Boy showed us a very touching story called [The Giving Tree]. Its about a tree's unconditional love and sacrifice for the boy she loved.
It's really touching and emotional, so get ready a box of tissues...
Environmentalist Blogged:14:21
